Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, Vol. 9, No. 1, March 2008

Impact Assessment Of I/S Technology Utilization On Knowledge Creation And Conversion:

An Empirical Study In Jordanian Universities

Faleh Abdulgader Alhawary, Applied Science Private University, Jordan, Fayez Jomah Alnajjar, Alisra Private University, Jordan

ABSTRACT:

This study examines the impact of information systems (I/S) technology utilization on knowledge creation and conversion by applying the SECI model (Socialization, Externalization, Combination, Internalization) by the academic staff of the Jordanian universities. The population for this study consisted of full-time academic staff in both departments; management information systems and business administration at the Jordanian universities, state and private. A simple random sampling technique was used to select the respondents surveyed for this study, a total of 220 questionnaires were administered to respondents chosen from 10 universities; statistical tools were used to test the hypothesis such as: one way ANOVA and simple regression. The findings indicated that there were no significant differences in the perception of academic staff at the Jordanian universities toward the utilization of information systems technology for the purpose of knowledge creation and conversion. The study also showed that the information systems technology had a significant impact on knowledge creation and conversion through applying the SECI model.

Keywords: Information Systems, Information technology, Knowledge, Jordan Universities



1.         Introduction

Modern business organizations view knowledge as the most valuable and strategic resource. They realize that to remain in business and be able to achieve competitive advantage they must explicitly manage their intellectual resources and capabilities. Firms must not only exploit their existing knowledge, but must also invest in continually exploring new knowledge (Sambaurthy, 2005).

Knowledge creation and conversion lie between the tacit and explicit forms. Tacit knowledge is actionable, and therefore most valuable, andmuch recent attention has focused on the importance of tacit knowledge for sustaining competitiveness (Lam, 2000). It is also the most important basis for the generation of new knowledge. In their often-referenced work on innovation and knowledge creation, Nonaka and Takeuchi (1995) posit that organizational knowledge is created through a continuous and dynamic interpersonal interaction between tacit and explicit knowledge (Stenmark, 2000). They also emphasize in their work that there are four modes in which organizational knowledge is created through the interaction and conversion between tacit and explicit. These are socialization, externalization, combination, internalization (Weichoo, 1998).

Organizations that plan to introduced knowledge management had difficulty, as they face the barrier of the application, acquisition, and extension of knowledge, hence information technologies play a critical role in shaping organizational efforts for knowledge creation, acquisition, integration, valuation, and use (Sambaurthy,2005). The use of information technology is not new. The early pioneers have used it, but still it is not common to all organizations; however it is important to note that knowledge creation cannot be done by the deployment of technology tools alone, rather it requires the willingness of people to deal with technology tools.

The primary purpose of this study is to assess the impact of information system technology utilization on applying the SECI model for the purpose of knowledge creation and conversion based on the belief that effective adoption of four modes of Nonaka and Takeuchi model requires the support of information system technology. This I/S technology consists of networks of three types (internet, intranet, and extranet) and the database. These components play a critical role as they facilitate and accelerate the speed of knowledge transfer and conversion from tacit to explicit and vice versa. The various types of tools which has been developed for the purpose of this study (which were to be connected and utilized along with networks and database) will be discussed and elaborated on through out theoretical framework.

2.         Theoretical Framework

2.1.      Knowledge: Concept And Classification

In general the word "knowledge" refers to a state of knowing, by which we also mean to be acquainted or familiar with, to be aware of, to recognize or apprehend facts, methods, principles, techniques and so on. On the other hand the working definition of knowledge considers it as the" fluid mix” of framed experience, values, contextual information, and expert insight that provides a framework for evaluating and incorporating new experiences and information. It originates and is applied in the minds of the knower in the organizations; it often becomes embedded not only in documents or repositories but also in organizational routines, processes, practices and norms (Nickols, 2000).

Human knowledge exists in different forms: tacit and explicit, tacit knowledge is that which is experiential, intuitive, insights and hunches. It is the subjective and experience-based knowledge that cannot be expressed in words, sentences, and formalized or articulated, and therefore difficult to share. Explicit knowledge on the other hand refers to knowledge that has been expressed into words and numbers. such knowledge can be shared formally and systematically in the form of data, specifications, manuals, drawings, audio and video tapes, computer programs, patents, and the like (Fernandez et al.,2004).

Despite the distinction between tacit and explicit knowledge, Nonaka and Takeuchi believe that tacit and explicit knowledge are mutually complementary entities, which interact with and interchange into each other in the creative activities of human beings (Kathuri, 2002).

2.2.      Information System Technology Fundamentals

Information system technology is a set of interrelated information technologies that work together to process, store, retrieve, collect, and distribute information. The major parts of an information system include computer hardware, software, databases, networks, and people (Malaga, 2005). The focus of this study will be on networks of three types: Internet, intranet, extranet, and on database as a main infrastructure for knowledge creation and conversion.

Internet was designed to connect different networks (LANs and WANs) across the world and perform this task using special computers called routers (Jashapara, 2004).  The most popular internet applications are e-mail, browsing the sites on the World Wide Web (WWW), and participating in special-interest news groups (O’Brien, 2002).

Intranets are internal company networks that use the internet and web technologies that allow users to find and share documents, collaborate, and communicate with each other. Think of an intranet as a mini-internet, one that is internal to accompany; only authorized users can access intranets, which are secured by firewalls (Malaga, 2005).

Extranet on the other hand is a web site that allows customers and business partners limited access to an organizations extranet, similar to an intranet. An extranet uses internet and www protocols. It operates similar to intranets but is directed at customers rather than employees. By using extranets, companies are making this type of information increasingly available at a single interactive site that is easy to navigate (Alter, 2001).

Database refers to structured collection of electronically stored data that is controlled and accessed through computers based on predefined relationships between predefined types of data items related to a specific business, situation, or problem (Alter, 2001). Knowledge discovery in databases is a process used to search for and extract useful information from volumes of documents and data (Turban et al.2006).

3.         The Proposed Framework And Hypothesis.

This study developed a conceptual framework that consist of two parts: the first part of the framework consisted of information systems technology (networks of three types and database) and proposed tools that fit each mode; the second part illustrated the four modes of Nonaka and Takeuchi SECI model. Figure: 1) depicts the study model.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 1:  Research Framework / Study Model.

Hypothesis1: Academic staff (MIS & BA) at the Jordanian universities (state and private) will differ in their perception toward the utilization of IST for the purpose of knowledge creation and conversion.

Using IST tools utilization for applying SECI model:  There are many common knowledge management tools categories, which can be effectively used via IST for the purpose of knowledge creation and conversion they include: Intranet-Based, Electronic document management (EDM), Workflow systems support standardized business processes, Artificial intelligence- Based systems, Business intelligence (BI), Knowledge map systems. It also includes Innovation support tools, Competitive intelligence tools competitive intelligence (CI), Knowledge portals, and Video conferencing: Desktop video conferencing (DTVC), Text-Based conferencing (Jashapara, 2004; Alter, 2002; Rodrigo, Baroni, 2001; Marwick, 2001). Thus, we posit that:

Hypothesis 2: There is no significant impact of IST utilization on applying SECI model by the academic staff (MIS & BA) at the Jordanian universities (state and private). This hypothesis is broken in to four minor hypotheses:

                     i.      IST utilization for socialization (tacit to tacit): Socialization refers to a process where certain individuals or groups share their own experience to create and deliver their tacit knowledge such as spiritual models and skills. It is the process of transforming one tacit knowledge into another (Huang & Wang, 2003).

The most typical way in which knowledge is built and shared is in face-to-face meetings and shared experiences. An increasing proportion of meetings and other interpersonal interactions use on-line tools known as groupware. Groupware is a blend of synchronous (like chat), asynchronous (like e-groups) people feel free to exchange opinions and collaborate. There are other common tools of groupware summarized by Jashapara (2004)which include: Group decision support systems (GDSS) with brainstorming, ideas generation and voting system, collaborative writing and white boards, computer-based conferencing, schedule meetings and daily organizers, and finally e-mail systems used proactively. Thus, we posit that:

H0: 2.a. There is no significant impact of IST utilization on applying socialization for the purpose of knowledge creation and conversion.

                   ii.      IST utilization for externalization (tacit to explicit): Externalization refers to a process where tacit knowledge has gone through a socialization process and transformed into a specific concept (Explicit knowledge). Through an externalization process, tacit knowledge becomes specified, and metaphors, analogies, concepts, hypothesis and models, take shape (Nonaka, 1998). Collaboration systems and other groupware (for example, specialized brainstorming applications) can support this kind of interaction to some extent. On-line discussion databases are another potential tool to capture tacit knowledge and to apply it to immediate problems (Marwick, 2001).

Newsgroups and similar forums are open to all, unlike typical team discussions, and share some of the same characteristics in that questions can be posed and answered, but differ in that the participants are typically strangers. Newsgroups are willing to offer advice and assistance, presumably driven by a mixture of motivations including altruism, wish to be seen as an expert, and the thanks and positive feed back contributed by people they have helped (Kathuri, 2002). Thus, we posit that:

               H0: 2.b. There is no significant impact of IST utilization on applying externalization for the purpose of knowledge creation and conversion.

                  iii.      IST utilization for combination (explicit to explicit): Combination refers to a process where explicit knowledge is converted into more complicated sets of explicit knowledge through the systemization of concepts and conversion of knowledge (Nonaka &Konno, 1998). Once tacit knowledge has been conceptualized and articulated, thus converting it to explicit knowledge, capturing it in a persistent form as a report, e-mail, a presentation, or a Web page makes it available to the rest of the organization. Although the most common way by far to capture knowledge is to write a document, technology has made the use of other forms of media feasible. Digital audio and video recordings are now easily produced by those that have access to and know how to use the equipment and an expert may find that speaking to a camera or microphone is easier or more convenient than writing, particularly if the video is of a presentation that has to be made in the ordinary course of business. Search and data mining tools are the most important technology for the manipulation of explicit knowledge. Thus, we posit that:

   H0: 2.c. There is no significant impact of IST utilization on applying the combination for the purpose of knowledge creation and conversion.

                 iv.      IST utilization for internalization (explicit to tacit): Internalization refers to a process where new knowledge is created through the conversion of explicit knowledge into tacit knowledge within an organization (Nonaka&Konno, 1998). It is closely connected with “learning through practice” (Huang & Wang, 2003).

Internalization takes place when explicit knowledge is exposed to a new concept or method that is better than the existing ones (Riggins & Rhee, 1999). Technology can help users form new tacit knowledge, for example, by better appreciating and understanding explicit knowledge. It is a challenge of particular importance in knowledge management, since acquisition of tacit knowledge is a necessary precursor to taking constructive action. Methods to process explicit knowledge, already described, can support understanding. For example putting a document in the context of a subject category or of a step in a business process, by using document categorization can help a user to understand the applicability or potential value of its information. Thus, we posit that:

H0: 2.d. There is no significant impact of IST utilization on applying internalisation for the purpose of knowledge creation and conversion.

4.         Literature Review

Meng Yew (2006) found in his study that the online study course encouraged processes and created conditions consistent with Nonaka model of knowledge creation, the study also found that the student gained deep insights and understandings laden with tacit knowledge. Another interesting result of Berryman (2005) which was conducted to determine whether a relationship exists among participant group demographics (experience), and implementation of an integrated knowledge transfer system. Results suggested that an online training implementation is a valid tool for certain specific transfer design characteristics. The application of knowledge transfer system designed around organization-specific variables showed promise as a factor in enhanced knowledge transfer in web based training in virtual organizations. Lee & Suh (2003) conducted a research which intended to explore the efforts of Korean enterprises to convert data and information into knowledge which are related to the use of information technology. They found that Korean enterprises place high value on the application of information technology in introducing knowledge management .It also showed that the use of information technology is not common to all enterprises in four kinds of knowledge conversion.

Lertpittaypoom (2005) stressed in his study the importance of critical knowledge, which can be obtained from the environment, often through partnership arrangements. Such arrangements are widespread in information system implementation where technology-related capabilities are vital to the success of the implementation. The study followed a qualitative research methodology by conducting an in depth case study to answer the research questions. The case study is a software implementation project where the client is a major University in the Midwestern part of the US and the major vendor is one of the largest technology vendors in the technology industry. It was found that to involve the flows of knowledge at the individuals, groups, and organizational levels; knowledge sharing could be observed from the knowledge that flows from one level to another. Huang & Wang (2003) found in their study that, socialization, combination and internalization abilities level owned by team members have positive relationships with knowledge transfer and creation. The completeness of knowledge conversion abilities also has positive relationships with knowledge transfer and creation.  Chua (2002) study examined the influence of social interaction on the process of knowledge creation in an institute of higher education. The findings found a positive correlation between the level of social interaction and the quality of the modules developed. Among the three dimensions of social interaction, the relational dimension was shown to be the strongest predictor of the quality of the modules developed. In addition, the findings confirm the difficulty associated with knowledge measurement.

5.         Study Methodology

5.1.      Population And Sample

The target population of this study comprised all the Jordanian universities (state and private). Official statistical sources of the Ministry of Higher Education in Jordan indicated a total number of (26) universities, (10) are state universities and (16) are private universities. A sample of (10) universities were chosen randomly according to simple random sampling; the unit of the study are department members in both departments: Management Information Systems and Business Administration at the faculty of economic and business administrative sciences. (220) questionnaires were distributed to academic staff in both departments (MIS & BA); (200) questionnaires were returned from academic staff, (6) questionnaires were excluded from the analysis leaving (194) questionnaires that were included in the analysis.

 5.2.     Data Collection

Primary data collection and secondary data collection methods were engaged. The primary data collection was carried out using a self-designed questionnaire. Secondary data was collected based on the findings of prior studies, published papers, articles, books and the World Wide Web (Internet).

5.3.      Instrument For Primary Data Collection

A questionnaire survey was adopted to collect the primary data in this study, the questionnaire comprises two sections, the first section covers the demographic information (University type, academic staff, Experience). The second section represent the instrument, we selected (16) items of Information Systems Technology, and (22) item of the SECI model as follow: (1-4) measures the usage of Internet, (5-8) measures the usage of Intranet, (9-12) measures the usage of Extranet, (13-16) measures the usage of Database, (17-22) measures the applying of Socialization, (23-28) measures the applying of Externalization, (29-33) measures the applying of Combination, (34-38) measures the applying of Internalization.

5.4.      Validity And Reliability Of The Data

5.4.1.   Validity Of Data Collected

To ensure the face validity of the instrument tool, it was given to six expert referees from both departments; Management information systems and business administration in the faculty of economics and administrative sciences at the Applied science private university and Alisra University. The referees displayed their constructive comments and suggestions, which were taken into consideration.

5.4.2.   Reliability Of Data Collected

The reliability of data collected was measured using Cronbach alpha coefficient; the reliability test was conducted to check for inter-item correlation in each of the variables in the questionnaire. The test results are as follows: Cronbach alpha for Independent Variable = 0.8642, Cronbach alpha for dependent Variable = 0.8951, Cronbach alpha for over all instrument = 0.9255, which exceeded the acceptable limit [24].

5.4.3.   Data Analysis

In order to test the hypothesis, the following tools were used: descriptive analysis frequencies, means and standard deviation were calculated, while to test the hypothesis one way ANOVA was used to measure the differences between groups, and finally simple regression analysis was calculated to asses the impact of IST on applying the SECI model.

6.         HypothesisTesting.

6.1.      Test Hypothesis 1

Test whether academic staff (MIS & BA) at the Jordanian universities (state and private) will differ in their perception toward the utilization of IST for the purpose of knowledge creation and conversion, we carried out one-way ANOVA analysis. It was found that ANOVA for the perception is not significant, refer to Table (1) (sum of square between groups =0.181 with (df=1, F=0.696, P=0.405). Based on this result we reject the null hypothesis1, and accept the alternative hypothesis, the perception of academicians of state and private Jordanian universities do not differ toward the utilization of IST for the purpose of knowledge creation and conversion.

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 


6.2.      Test The Major Hypothesis 2

Test that "there is no significant impact of IST utilization on applying SECI model by the academic staff (MIS & BA) at the Jordanian universities (state and private)". This hypothesis is the study carried out the simple regression to test the major hypothesis; tables (2.a., 2.b., 2.c.) depict the model. It was found encouraging result here. It shows that the value of (R2 = 0.437), this means that IST was able to explain (43.7%) of the variance in the dependent variable, it also shows the F value is (f=49.262) significant at (P≤0.05), in addition the value of Beta (β=0.661, P£0.05). Based on the result we reject the null hypothesis 2 and accept alternative hypothesis that indicate IST has a significant impact on applying the SECI model by the academic staff at level (P£0.05).

 
Table 2. Impact of IST utilization on applying the SECI model

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


6.3.      Test Minor hypotheses

6.3.1.   Test Minor Ho: 2.a

That "There is no significant impact of IST utilization on applying socialization for the purpose of knowledge creation and conversion". The study carried out the simple regression to test the minor hypothesis. Tables (3.a., 3.b., 3.c.) depict the model. It shows that the value of (R2 = 0.616), this means that IST were able to explain (61.6%) of the variance in the dependent variable (socialization). It also shows the F value is (f=75.744) significant at level (P≤0.05), which mean there is statistical evidence to support the existence of a relationship effect between the utilization of information systems technology and socialization, it also shows that the coefficients of individual independent variables of internet, intranet, extranet, database is: (0.085, -0.048, 0.346, and 0.489) respectively. In addition there is statistical evidence to show that beta value for extranet (β=0.346, P£0.05), and database (β=0.489, P£0.05). Based on the result we reject the Ho:2.a and accept alternative hypothesis that indicates: IST has a significant impact on socialization at level (P£0.05).

Table 3.  Impact of IST Utilization On Socialization.

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


6.3.2.   Test minor Ho:2.b

That "There is no significant impact of IST utilization on applying Externalization for the purpose of knowledge creation and conversion". The study carried out the simple regression to test the minor hypothesis. Tables (4.a., 4.b., 4.c.) depict the model it shows that the value of (R2 = 0.219), this means that IST was able to explain (21.9%) of the variance in the dependent variable (externalization). It also shows the F value is (f=13.214) significant at level (P≤0.05), which mean there is statistical evidence to support the existence of a relationship effect between the utilization of information systems technology and socialization. It also shows that the coefficients of individual independent variables of internet, intranet, extranet, database is: (-0.023, -0.151, 0.062, and 0.477) respectively. In addition there is statistical evidence to show that beta value for intranet (β=0.083, P£0.05), and database (β=0.477, P£0.05). Based on the result we reject the Ho: 2.b and accept alternative hypothesis that indicates: IST has a significant impact on externalization at level (P£0.05).

Table 4. IST Impact On Externalization.

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


6.3.3.   Test Minor Ho:2.c

That "There is no significant impact of IST utilization on applying combination for the purpose of knowledge creation and conversion". The study carried out the simple regression to test the minor hypothesis. Tables (5.a., 5.b., 5.c.) depict the model. It shows that the value of (R2 = 0.298), this means that IST were able to explain (29.8%) of the variance in the dependent variable (combination). It also shows the F value is (f=20.017) significant at (P≤0.05), which mean there is statistical evidence to support the existence of a relationship effect between the utilization of information systems technology and combination. It also shows that the coefficients of individual independent variables of Internet, intranet, extranet, database are (-0.073, 0.045, -0.033, and 0.568) respectively. In addition there is statistical evidence to show that beta value for database (β=0.568, P£0.05). Based on the result we reject the Ho: 2.c and accept alternative hypothesis that indicates: IST has a significant impact at level (P£0.05) on combination.

Table 5. IST The Impact On Combination.

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


6.3.4.      Test minor Ho:2.d

Test whether there is no significant impact of IST utilization on applying the internalization for the purpose of knowledge creation and conversion., the study carried out the simple regression to test the minor hypothesis. Tables (6.a., 6.b., 6.c.) depict the model, it shows that the value of (R2 = 0.429), this means that IST were able to explain (42.9%) of the variance in the dependent variable (internalization), it also shows the F value is (f=35.567) significant at (P≤0.000) there is statistical evidence to support the existence of a relationship effect between the utilization of information systems technology and combination between academic staff. It also shows that the coefficients of individual independent variables of internet, intranet, extranet, database are (0.168, 0.058, 0.411, and 0.166) respectively. In addition there is statistical evidence to show that beta value for Internet (β=0.168, P£0.05), extranet (β=0.411, P£0.05), and database (β=0.166, P£0.05). Based on the result we reject the Ho:2.d and accept alternative hypothesis that indicates: IST has a significant impact at level (P£0.05) on internalization.

Table 6. IST Impact On Internalization.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 


7.         Conclusion And Recommendations

The findings of this empirical study confirmed the following:

Ø      The study indicated that there are no differences between academic staff (MIS & BA) at the Jordanian universities (state and private) in their Perception toward the utilization of information systems technology for the purpose of knowledge creation and conversion.

Ø      The Study revealed that information systems technology had a significant impact at level (P£0.05) on knowledge creation and conversion through applying the SECI model by the academic staff at the Jordanian universities.

Ø      The study showed that there is statistical evidence to support the existence relationship effect between the utilization of information systems technology and socialization, In addition, the study showed that β value for extranet, and database is significant at level (P£0.05).

Ø      The study revealed that there is statistical evidence to support the existence relationship effect between the utilization of information systems technology and externalization; In addition, the study showed that β value for intranet and database is significant at level (P£0.05).

Ø      The study indicated that there is statistical evidence to support the existence relationship effect between the utilization of information systems technology and combination; In addition, the study showed that β value for database is significant at level (P£0.05).

Ø      The study indicated that there is statistical evidence to support the existence relationship effect between the utilization of information systems technology and internalization; In addition, the study showed that β value for internet, extranet, and database is significant at level (P£0.05).

Based on the study findings, the authors make the following recommendations:

Ø      Mutual trust, selfsteem and confidences are important in interpersonal interaction especially when doing so via networks.

Ø      It's believed that, universities, private or public, government and none government  through out the Arab world in particular can play a major role in adopting the many examples of knowledge tools that can enhance the knowledge  creation and conversion

Ø      Universities are considered to be the huge repository of knowledge, this requires from universities managements to continue invest on that through providing all the means to facilitate the interaction among and between academic staff, and continually encouraging and motivating department members to build stronger relationships with each other.

8.         References

Alter, S., Information Systems the Foundation of E-Business (4th ed.), Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education, Inc., New Jersey, 2001.

Berryman, R., "Knowledge Management in Virtual Organizations: Study of Best Practices Knowledge Transfer Model", University of North Texas. UMI Proquest Digital Dissertations-Full   Citation & Abstract AT 3181033. Retrieved on 10/ 4/ 2006. (2005).

Chua, A., "The Influence of Social Interaction on Knowledge Creation", Journal of Intellectual  Capital, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 375-392, available at: http://www.emerald-library.com/ft, 2002..

de Carvalho, R.B., Ferreira, M.A.T., "Using Information Technology to Support Knowledge Conversion Processes", Information Research, vol. 7, no. 1, October 2001, available at: http://InformationR.net/ir/7-1/paper118.html], 22001.

Fernandez, I.B., Gonzalez, A., Sabherwal, R., Knowledge Management Cchallenges Solutions, and Technologies, Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall. , New Jersey,  2004.

Huang, J., Wang, S., "Knowledge Conversion Abilities and Knowledge Creation and  Innovation: Anew Perspective on Team Composition, available at: httpwww.alba.edu. from www.google.com., 2003.

Jashapara, A., Knowledge Management, an Integrated Approach, Pearson Education Limited, Edinburgh Gate, Harlow, England, 2004.

Kathuri, S., "Knowledge in Organizations Definition, Creation, and Harvesting", Harvard Edu Spring, available at: http//www.gseweb, 2002.

Lam, A., "Tacit knowledge, Organizational Learning and Societal Institutions: An Integrated Framework", available at: http//www.findarticles.com, 2000. 

Lee, H, Suh, Y., "Knowledge Conversion with Information Technology of Korean  Companies", Business Process Management Journal, vol. 9 no. 3, pp. 317-336, available at: http://www.emerald-library.com/ft,  2003.

Lertpittayapoom, Nongkran, "An Exploratory Study on Interorganizational Knowledge Sharing in an   Information System Implementation Environment", UMI Proquest Digital Dissertations-Full        citation & Abstract, 2005.

Malaga, R.A., Information Systems Technology., Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education, Inc., New jersey, 2005.

Marwick, A.D., "Knowledge Management Technology", IBM Systems Journal: Knowledge  Management Technology, available at: http//www.Findarticles.com, 2001.

Meng Yew, T., "Sharing and Cultivating Tacit Knowledge in an E-learning Environment Naturalistic   Study", University of Kansas, UMI Proquest Digital Dissertations-Full Citation & Abstract, 2006. 

Nickols, F., "The Knowledge in Knowledge Management", available at: http//home.att.net-nickolsk. Com, 2000.

Nonaka, I., Intellectualizing Capability, in NA. S.U. (Ed.) Knowledge Management Meilkvungie Shimunsha Publishing, Seoul, South Korea, 1998.

Nonaka, I., Konno, N., "The Concept of ‘ba’: Building A Foundation for Knowledge Creation", California Management Review, vol. 40, no. 3, pp.12-24, 1998.

Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H., The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation, Oxford University Press, 1995

O’Brien, J.A., Management Information System, Managing Technology in the Internetworked Enterprise (4th ed.), McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., Irwin, 2002.

Riggins, F.I., Rhee, H., "Developing the Learning Network Using Extranets", International Journal of Electronic Commerce, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 65-83, 1999.

Sambamurthy, V., Subramani, M., "Special Issue on Information Technologies and Knowledge Management",   MIS Quarterly,  vol. 29, no. 1, pp.1-7,  March, 2005.

Stenmark, R., "The Creative Intranet: Factors for Corporate Knowledge Creation", 2000.

Turban, E., Mclean, J., Wethrbe, Information Technology for Management. Improving Quality  and Productivity, John Wiley, New York, 2006.

Weichoo, C., "Perspectives on Managing Knowledge in Organizations", available at: http//choo.fis.utoronto.caf.com, 1998.

Zikmund, W.G., Business Research Methods (6th. ed.), Dryden Press, Harcourt College Publishers, New York, 2002


About the Authors:

Dr. Faleh Abdelgader Alhawary holds a PhD in Business Administration, majoring in Information Technology Strategies and Competitive advantage, he is an assistant professor at Applied Science Private University, Amman - Jordan    His main research interests lie in knowledge management, E-Government, Organizational learning, Strategic management and TQM. He can be contacted: Amman-Jordan P.O. Box:  (11931) Amman    code # (11192) Telephone: 00962 6 (5609999) Ext.1311 Mobile (0096279-5777198) Email: Faleh_Alhawary@asu.edu.jo, or Alhawary2002@yahoo.com

Dr. Fayez Jomah Alnajjar Allisra holds a PhD in Business Administration, majoring in Management Information Systems, he is an assistant professor at Alisra Private University, Amman - Jordan    His main research interests lie in management Information Systems, Entrepreneurship, Strategic management. He can be contacted: Amman-Jordan P.O. Box:  (22) Amman code # (11622); Telephone: 00962 6 (4711710) Ext.2338; Mobile (0096277-7406117); Email: Najjar_fayez@yahoo.com