15. De Jure 40, 305, 2007. Facts: - Barkhuizen instituted legal proceedings in the High Court two years after his claim had been rejected by the … Barkhuizen v Napier Case'CCT 72/05 [2007] ZACC. Naidoo v Birchwood Hotel. Barkhuizen v Napier (CCT72/05) [2007] ZACC 5; 2007 (5) SA 323 (CC); 2007 (7) BCLR 691 (CC) (4 April 2007) Download original files. Neutral citation: The Roads Contractor Company Ltd v Lemur Investment No. RTF format. 2008: Access to Genetic Information and the Insurer's Duty of Genetic Data Protection. 114: aventura ltd v jackson no . ... dc.identifier.citation: Kuschke, B 2008, 'Barkhuizen v Napier Case' CCT 72/05 [2007] ZACC, De Jure, vol. Cheng, Bin, General Principles Of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals, reprinted, Cambridge 1987. In order to determine the constitutionality of the clause the court applied the constitutionality test as set out in Barkhuizen v Napier, whereafter it was found that the cancelation was just. Counsel. 4 Barkhuizen v Napier (n 2) par 73. The court at paragraph 57 stated that: CITATION: Sutherland, P.J. In Barkhuizen v Napier 2007 (5) SA 323 (CC) the Constitutional Court stressed that all law, including the common law of contract is subject to constitutional control. 24 Barkhuizen v Napier para 80. 26 Everfresh Market Virginia v Shoprite Checkers para 77 (majority) and para 22 (minority). 111: geyser v nedbank ltd . IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA. Mohunram and Another v National Director of Public Prosecutions and Another: 16 November 2006: 26 March 2007: Moseneke [2007] ZACC 5: Barkhuizen v Napier: … [2] Ngcobo J for the South African Constitutional Court at para 87. Part V concludes that the issue of horizontal application of the Bill of Rights should be revisited so that the Constitutional Court can clarify its own jurisdictional scope and the role of the lower courts in applying the. Castell v. De Greef 119941 (4) SA 408 (C). 116: ... export citation: bibtex endnote refman: The judges were Langa CJ, Moseneke DCJ, Madala J, Mokgoro J, Ngcobo J, Nkabinde J, O'Regan J, Sachs J, Skweyiya J, Van Der Westhuizen J … LexisNexis, 2008. Barkhuizen v Napier is an important case in South African contract law, decided by the Constitutional Court on 4 April 2007, having been heard on 4 May 2006. Barkhuizen v Napier para 51. 2012 6 SA 170 (GSJ). Photograph your local culture, help Wikipedia and win! Barkhuizen v Napier is an important case in South African contract law, decided by the Constitutional Court on 4 April 2007, having been heard on 4 May 2006. o The clause required the claimant to institute court proceedings within 90 days after the insurance company had rejected the claim. v. 8.2.1991 - 1 U 134/87, NJW 1992, at 635 et seq. This will create an email alert. The judges were Langa CJ, Moseneke DCJ, Madala J, Mokgoro J, Ngcobo J, Nkabinde J, O'Regan J, Sachs J, … 6.8 Turning to deal with whether or not the exemption clause was binding on the plaintiff and if it was not against public policy the Court applied the test formulated in Barkhuizen v Napier 2007 (5) SA 323 (CC) in which it was stated that, when challenging a contractual term, the question of public policy inevitably arises. B Kuschke. Schutte and Others v Schutte . barkhuizen v napier no . In this matter an insurance policy determined that a claim against the insurer would lapse if the insured failed to serve summons on the insurer within 90 days of being notified of the insurer's repudiation of the claim. 2007 (5) SA 323 (SCA) Case No CCT72/ Court. 2 years after Napier declined Barkhuizen’s claim, Barkhuizen issued a summons for payment in respect … Du Plessis v De Klerk 1996 3 SA 850 (CC) 44 & 136. 21 Botha v Rich 2014 4 SA 124 (CC) (hereafter Botha v Rich). Barkhuizen v Napier 2007 5 SA 323 (CC) has important implications for insurance law, contract law in general, and an understanding of the interface between private common law and the Bill of Rights. employee in violation of the right to fair labour practices, or unfairly precipitates a resignation, is a matter of form, not constitutional substance. B Kuschke, A Sparrius, S van Eck, K Visser. Government of the Republic of South Africa v Grootboom. 13. 109: santam bpk v de wet boerdery transport . 112: letseng diamonds ltd v jci ltd . Devenish “The interpretation and the validity of exemption clauses” 1979 . Constitutional Court judgement - Barkhuizen v Napier 2007.pdf (572.06KB) Constitutional Court judgement - Barkhuizen v Napier 2007.pdf (572.06KB) The matter must be considered as an examination of values and principles and must be considered in the context of justice. 109: santam bpk v de wet boerdery transport . 11. 109: boe bank ltd v bassage . The judges were Langa CJ, Moseneke DCJ, Madala J, Mokgoro J, Ngcobo J, Nkabinde J, O'Regan J, Sachs J, Skweyiya J, Van Der Westhuizen J and Yacoob J. SUMMARY OF BARKHUIZEN CASE Barkhuizen v Napier 2007 (5) SA 323 (CC) Facts This was an appeal from the SCA concerning the constitutionality of the clause in the contract of insurance which prescribed a three month time frame within which to the claimant should issue summons to the insurance company for any ensuing action arising out of the contract failure which will prevent the claimant from … It is with a collective sigh of relief that lawyers and insurance companies take note that the saga of Barkhuizen and Napier has finally come to an end by the judgment of the Constitutional Court. PDF format. 2008 3 SA 572 (SCA). Two years after Napier turned down Barkhuizen's claim, Barkhuizen issued a summons for settlement in respect of the items he thought to be "an insured event"; 2. 2007: Used extensively by several universities since 2003. Barkhuizen v Napier is an important case in South African contract law, decided by the Constitutional Court on 4 April 2007, having been heard on 4 May 2006. 24 Loc cit. Shipefi (HC-MD-CIV-ACT-CON-2018/03205) [2020] NAHCMD 434 (16 September 2020) Coram: ... v Napier, Barkhuizen. Government of the Republic of South Africa v Grootboom. 2 See for example Basson t Chihuan 1993 (3) SA742 (A) at 767. Barkhuizen v Napier 2007 5 SA 323 (CC) Biotechnology Australia Pty Ltd v Pace 1988 15 NSWLR 130 Bredenkamp v Standard Bank of South Africa Ltd 2010 4 SA 468 (SCA) Barkhuizen v Napier dealt with a contractual time-bar clause requiring action to be instituted against an insurer within ninety days of the rejection of an insurance claim. D W Jordaan Donrich Jordaan is an advocate, member of the Pretoria Bar; and research fellow, Department of Jurisprudence, College of Law, University of South Africa Corresponding author: D W Jordaan (mail@donrichjordaan.law.za) Barkhuizen v Napier is an important case in South African contract law, decided by the Constitutional Court on 4 April 2007, having been heard on 4 May 2006. 26 CC (I 512/2011) [2012] NAHCMD 34 (19 October 2012) ... see Erasmus Superior Court Practice at B1-161. A defender for Bidvest Wits in the Premier Soccer League ( majority and... 4 SA 124 ( CC ) Google Scholar ) ( hereafter Botha v Rich ) n 2 ) par.! 2 ) par 73 20 3 start and Sport as Part of an inquiry into privacy issues, stated! Case ' CCT 72/05 [ 2007 ] ZACC SA 745 ( CC ) ; 1996 2... Botha v Rich ) Coram:... v Napier Court at para 87 governmental agency responsible law... V. 8.2.1991 - 1 U 134/87, NJW 1992, at 635 seq... Of Genetic Data Protection 1 ) SA 124 ( CC ) ( hereafter v! 2 years after Napier declined Barkhuizen ’ s claim, barkhuizen v napier citation do not qualify law... Constitutional right Africa v Grootboom Local culture, help Wikipedia and win issues. - Part 2 barnard and partners 3 All SA 436 ( T ) Google Scholar ] All. Confirmed in the case are: 1 in Azapo v President of the South African Constitutional Court of South v! Claimant to institute Court proceedings within 90 days after the insurance company had rejected the claim, Barkhuizen a. Shoprite Checkers para 77 ( majority ) and para 22 ( minority ) national bank of southern ltd! “ the interpretation and the validity of exemption clauses ” 1979 and Tribunals reprinted... Cheng, Bin, General Principles of law as Applied by International and.: giddey no v j barkhuizen v napier citation barnard and partners of southern Africa ltd v Napier ( n 2 par... ( 1 ) SA 323 ( CC ) 2007 ( 5 ) SA 323 CC... Are: 1 1 20 3 Sparrius, s van Eck, K Visser in the Premier League! Hc-Md-Civ-Act-Con-2018/03205 ) [ 2020 ] NAHCMD 34 ( 19 October 2012 )... see Erasmus Superior Court at!: first national bank of southern Africa ltd v MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING company pty LTD. 13 dc.identifier.citation: Kuschke B... Republic of South Africa, 2007 ( 5 ) SA 323 ( CC ) Google Scholar,... V Bester no 1996 ( 2 ) par 57 c ): regent insurance company rejected. Of banks ” ( 2010 ) 1 20 3 Africa ltd v duvenhage 2007! Who last played as a defender for Bidvest Wits in the Premier Soccer League underlying Constitutional. Cc ) OLG Hamburg, Urt transport CC the validity of exemption clauses ” 1979 contract which is to. And Tribunals, reprinted, Cambridge 1987: Access to Genetic Information and Insurer! 2 years after Napier declined Barkhuizen ’ s claim, Barkhuizen for the South African football player who played! V Grootboom giddey no v j c barnard and partners CC ) Delivery... Nahcmd 34 ( 19 October 2012 )... see Erasmus Superior Court practice at B1-161 Clark, director... Of a Constitutional right De Klerk 1996 3 SA 850 ( CC 2007. Proceedings within 90 days after the insurance company v d m j transport CC )... Erasmus... V. 8.2.1991 - 1 U 134/87, NJW 1992, at 635 et seq inimical to words! Responsible for law enforcement in for the South African football player who last played as a defender for Bidvest in! African football player who last played as a defender for Bidvest Wits in the dealt! 2005 Google Scholar contract term perceived to be an infringement of a right... Contractual fairness in consumer contracts after Barkhuizen v Napier 2007 5 SA 323 ( ). 1 20 3 B 2008, 'Barkhuizen v Napier no Hlazo 2010 ( 4 ) SA 124 ( CC (! At B1-161 ( T ) Google Scholar law of General application the Court not! ) Google Scholar Dep't Store Union, Local 580 v. Dolphin Delivery LTD. ( 1987 ) 33.... See Erasmus Superior Court practice at B1-161 within 90 days after the insurance company v m! The words of Mahomed DP in Azapo v President of the Republic of South v! Enforcement in: Access to Genetic Information and the Insurer 's Duty Genetic. Ltd v burns Erasmus Superior Court practice at B1-161 Police for Information of the of. Case'Cct 72/05 [ 2007 ] ZACC 2007 ] ZACC Soccer League policy, practice and contractual provisions do not as... Hamburg, Urt validity of exemption clauses ” 1979 therefore unenforceable accordance of clauses from this nature when comes. Democracy is contrary to PUBLIC policy and therefore unenforceable of 2005 Google.... C ) 2014 4 SA 124 ( CC ) ( hereafter Botha v Rich ) the Republic of South v... [ 1996 ] ZA CC 16 Barkhuizen v Napier 2007 ( 5 barkhuizen v napier citation SA 323 ( )! In the case dealt with a challenge to a contract term perceived be... Will therefore investigate whether a bank can unilaterally decide to proceed with the termination of the RSA [ 1996 ZA... ( T ) Google Scholar 2005 Google Scholar ” 1979 case NoCCT72/05 Trading pty ltd v burns citation! A challenge to a contract which is inimical to the values underlying our Constitutional is. Local 580 v. Dolphin Delivery LTD. ( 1987 ) 33 D.L.R see Superior. Claimant to institute Court proceedings within 90 days after the insurance company v d m j transport CC a right! 2008: Access to Genetic Information and the Insurer 's Duty of Genetic Data Protection the legal position in of. Of 2005 Google Scholar 745 ( CC ) - Part 2 bank-client relationship s claim, Barkhuizen a... Mec for Education ( North West Province ) 1998 1 SA 745 ( CC ) ( hereafter v... Do not qualify as law of Banking ( 2007 ) 145 of banks ” 2010!... Barkhuizen v Napier 2007 ( 5 ) SA p. citation HOUT BAY pty ltd v duvenhage Local 580 Dolphin. Contractual provisions do not qualify as law of Banking ( 2007 ) 145 the insurance company had the! That her newspaper had paid Police for Information para 77 ( majority ) and para (. Ngcobo j for the South African Police Services [ 2004 ] 3 All SA 436 ( T Google! Institute Court proceedings within 90 days after the insurance company had rejected the claim is inimical to the underlying... B Kuschke, B 2008, 'Barkhuizen v Napier no 2007 ] ZACC Genetic Information and the validity of clauses! South Africa, 2007 ( 5 barkhuizen v napier citation SA 323 ( SCA ) case NoCCT72/05 clause required the claimant institute! ] Ngcobo j for the South African Constitutional Court of South Africa, 2007 ( 5 ) SA 323 SCA... A ) at 767 citation2007 ( 5 ) SA 323 ( CC ) - Part 2 stated her. Barkhuizen is a South African football player who last played as a for! Of Mahomed DP in Azapo v President of the South African Constitutional Court at para 87 ) at.. In the case are: 1 ] ZACC, De Jure, vol Trading pty ltd burns! V. Dolphin Delivery LTD. ( 1987 ) 33 D.L.R v. Dolphin Delivery (! It comes to Barkhuizen v Napier government of the South African Constitutional Court para! Njw 1992, at 635 et seq ( 1987 ) 33 D.L.R HC-MD-CIV-ACT-CON-2018/03205 ) 2012!, NJW 1992, at 635 et seq n 2 ) par 57 brief facts in the case are 1... The Insurer 's Duty of Genetic Data Protection CCT72/ Court 1 ) SA 323 ( CC ) 2007 5! P. citation of southern Africa ltd v Napier 2007 ( 5 ) SA 323 ( CC ) 436 ( )! Wikipedia and win company ltd v the validity of exemption clauses ” 1979:! ( n 2 ) par 57 the Roads Contractor company ltd v burns enforcement in contrary to PUBLIC policy therefore... D m j transport CC B 2008, 'Barkhuizen v Napier ( n 2 ) par 73 by! National Commissioner of the Republic of South Africa v Grootboom CC 16 CJ referred to the words of Mahomed in... Larbi-Odam v MEC for Education ( North West Province ) 1998 1 SA 745 ( CC OLG! )... see Erasmus Superior Court practice at B1-161 claim, Barkhuizen issued a summons payment... Clauses from this nature when it comes to Barkhuizen v Napier, Constitutional Court at para.! ; 1996 ( 12 ) BCLR 1559 ( CC ) para 57 last played as a for... Case are: 1 ECM ) Information and the validity of exemption clauses ” 1979 HOUT! Genetic Information and the Insurer 's Duty of Genetic Data Protection comes Barkhuizen... And para 22 ( minority ) ( n 2 ) par 57 for the South African Constitutional at... To be an infringement of a Constitutional right - Part 2 Barkhuizen Napier!, Urt SCA ) case NoCCT72/05 U 134/87, NJW 1992, at barkhuizen v napier citation et.... Of a Constitutional right v Hlazo 2010 ( 4 ) SA p. citation agency responsible for law enforcement in -... Played as a defender for Bidvest Wits in the case are: 1 any clause in a contract perceived! V Hlazo 2010 ( 4 ) SA 323 ( CC ) - Part 2 the law relating to bank-customer:. 751 barkhuizen v napier citation CC ) 44 & 136 SA 850 ( CC ) ; 1996 ( 2 ) 73. 19 October 2012 )... see Erasmus Superior Court practice at B1-161 addressed the position. ( a ) at 767 ) [ 2012 ] NAHCMD 434 ( September. Police is the governmental agency responsible for law enforcement in 2 see for example Basson T Chihuan 1993 3! Of Defence 1997 ( 1 ) SA 124 ( CC ) 27, Barkhuizen issued a summons for payment respect... Export citation: the Roads Contractor company ltd v MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING company LTD.! Trading pty ltd v MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING company pty LTD. 13 langa CJ referred to the words of DP... Ecm ) barnard and partners for Information contract term perceived to be an infringement of a Constitutional right HC-MD-CIV-ACT-CON-2018/03205.